Demographics details for Cashion, OK vs Mendenhall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cashion, OK vs Mendenhall, MS.
| Data | Cashion | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 892 | 2,148 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $96,705 | $35,956 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Cashion vs Mendenhall
- The population in Mendenhall is higher at 2,148, compared to 892 in Cashion.
- The median age in Mendenhall is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher median income of $96,705 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cashion at 58.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 7% in Cashion.
- Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Cashion.
Demographics
Demographics Cashion vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cashion | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 65 |
| White | 53 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 22 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cashion vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 2% in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- Both Cashion and Mendenhall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cashion at 22% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cashion at 22% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cashion at 1% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cashion | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 46.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cashion vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Cashion.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 24.0% in Cashion.
- Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 15.4% in Cashion.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cashion at 15.9% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 36.9% in Cashion.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 15.0% in Cashion.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cashion | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (230) | 17.9% (385) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (46) | 20.7% (445) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (218) | 18.4% (395) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cashion vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Cashion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 5.2% in Cashion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.