Demographics details for Cashion, OK vs Cleveland heights, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cashion, OK vs Cleveland heights, OH.

Data Cashion Cleveland heights
Population 892 44,201
Median Age 33.3 years 36.7 years
Median Income $96,705 $69,155
Married Families 58.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 7% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.6

Population Comparison: Cashion vs Cleveland heights

  • The population in Cleveland heights is higher at 44,201, compared to 892 in Cashion.
  • The median age in Cleveland heights is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
  • Cashion has a higher median income of $96,705 compared to $69,155 in Cleveland heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cashion at 58.0% compared to 33.0% in Cleveland heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleveland heights at 13%, compared to 7% in Cashion.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Cashion.

Demographics

Demographics Cashion vs Cleveland heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cashion Cleveland heights
Black 2 42
White 53 46
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 22 3
Two or More Races 22 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cashion vs Cleveland heights

  • In Cleveland heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 2% in Cashion.
  • Cashion has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 46% in Cleveland heights.
  • In Cleveland heights, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Cashion.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cashion at 22% compared to 3% in Cleveland heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cashion at 22% compared to 4% in Cleveland heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cashion at 1% compared to 0% in Cleveland heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cashion Cleveland heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 10.9%
Depression 24.0% 21.8%
Smoking 15.4% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 16.7%
Obesity 36.9% 34.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cashion vs Cleveland heights

  • More residents in Cashion report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cashion at 24.0% compared to 21.8% in Cleveland heights.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Cashion.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleveland heights at 16.7% compared to 15.9% in Cashion.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cashion at 36.9% compared to 34.5% in Cleveland heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cashion at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleveland heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cashion Cleveland heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (157)
High School Diploma 25.8% (230) 9.5% (4,183)
Less than High School 5.2% (46) 3.7% (1,638)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.4% (218) 39.6% (17,513)

Education Levels Comparison: Cashion vs Cleveland heights

  • In Cleveland heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Cashion.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 9.5% in Cleveland heights.
  • More residents in Cashion have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 3.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • In Cleveland heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 24.4% in Cashion.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.