Demographics details for Casa grande, AZ vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Casa grande, AZ vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Casa grande | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,032 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $64,535 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Casa grande vs Gardner
- In Casa grande, the population is higher at 60,032, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 35.9 years in Casa grande.
- Casa grande has a higher median income of $64,535 compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Casa grande.
- Casa grande has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.4% in Casa grande.
Demographics
Demographics Casa grande vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Casa grande | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 35 | 82 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 41 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Casa grande vs Gardner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Casa grande at 3% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gardner at 82% compared to 35% in Casa grande.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Casa grande.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Casa grande at 41% compared to 8% in Gardner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Casa grande at 16% compared to 5% in Gardner.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Casa grande at 3% compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Casa grande | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Casa grande vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.8% in Casa grande.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gardner at 24.4% versus 20.0% in Casa grande.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Casa grande at 19.9% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Casa grande.
- Obesity rates are higher in Casa grande at 39.2% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Casa grande at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Casa grande | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (479) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (9,311) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (7,601) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (7,476) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Casa grande vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in Casa grande.
- In Gardner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 15.5% in Casa grande.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 12.7% in Casa grande.
- In Gardner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 12.5% in Casa grande.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.