Demographics details for Caruthersville, MO vs Forest park, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Caruthersville, MO vs Forest park, GA.

Data Caruthersville Forest park
Population 5,295 19,400
Median Age 36.8 years 31.3 years
Median Income $35,585 $41,837
Married Families 26.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 20% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 4.5

Population Comparison: Caruthersville vs Forest park

  • The population in Forest park is higher at 19,400, compared to 5,295 in Caruthersville.
  • Residents in Caruthersville have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
  • Forest park has a higher median income of $41,837, compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Caruthersville at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
  • Caruthersville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Forest park.
  • The unemployment rate in Caruthersville is higher at 5.6%, compared to 4.5% in Forest park.

Demographics

Demographics Caruthersville vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Caruthersville Forest park
Black 40 55
White 52 8
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 5 23
Two or More Races 3 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Caruthersville vs Forest park

  • In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 40% in Caruthersville.
  • Caruthersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Caruthersville.
  • Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 5% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest park at 8%, compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Caruthersville and Forest park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Caruthersville Forest park
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 17.0% 16.0%
Depression 25.6% 17.8%
Smoking 28.4% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 13.3%
Obesity 44.0% 43.0%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Caruthersville vs Forest park

  • More residents in Caruthersville report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Caruthersville at 25.6% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Caruthersville at 28.4% compared to 22.7% in Forest park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Caruthersville at 14.6% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Caruthersville at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Forest park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Caruthersville Forest park
No Schooling 0.8% (42) 2.6% (504)
High School Diploma 23.6% (1,249) 18.4% (3,567)
Less than High School 23.0% (1,217) 21.7% (4,202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.1% (484) 6.4% (1,235)

Education Levels Comparison: Caruthersville vs Forest park

  • In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Caruthersville hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
  • More residents in Caruthersville have less than a high school education at 23.0% compared to 21.7% in Forest park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Caruthersville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.