Demographics details for Carthage, TX vs Springhill, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, TX vs Springhill, LA.
| Data | Carthage | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,562 | 4,575 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 46.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,788 | $27,868 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Springhill
- In Carthage, the population is higher at 6,562, compared to 4,575 in Springhill.
- The median age in Springhill is higher at 46.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher median income of $42,788 compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carthage at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- The poverty level is higher in Springhill at 20%, compared to 19% in Carthage.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Carthage and Springhill at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Springhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 34 |
| White | 59 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Springhill
- In Springhill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 12% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 55% in Springhill.
- The Asian population is larger in Carthage at 1% compared to 0% in Springhill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 17% compared to 8% in Springhill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carthage at 11% compared to 2% in Springhill.
- In Springhill, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 23.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 18.7% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 31.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 42.1% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Springhill
- In Springhill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 19.1% in Carthage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springhill at 29.9% versus 24.6% in Carthage.
- Springhill has a higher smoking rate at 31.4% compared to 19.6% in Carthage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carthage at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Springhill.
- Springhill has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 42.1% in Carthage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (148) | 2.3% (104) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (705) | 22.5% (1,028) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (1,343) | 24.5% (1,122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (600) | 6.1% (277) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Springhill
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Carthage and Springhill at 2.3%.
- In Springhill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 10.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springhill at 24.5%, compared to 20.5% in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.