Demographics details for Carthage, TX vs Farmington, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, TX vs Farmington, MN.
| Data | Carthage | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,562 | 23,566 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,788 | $114,737 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Farmington
- The population in Farmington is higher at 23,566, compared to 6,562 in Carthage.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737, compared to $42,788 in Carthage.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 36.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Carthage is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 3 |
| White | 59 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 12% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to 59% in Carthage.
- In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 17% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carthage at 11% compared to 4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carthage and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 42.1% | 31.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Farmington
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 24.6% compared to 22.6% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 19.6% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 42.1% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (148) | 0.4% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (705) | 11.3% (2,674) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (1,343) | 7.1% (1,662) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (600) | 23.4% (5,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.3% compared to 10.7% in Carthage.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 9.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.