Demographics details for Carthage, TX vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, TX vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Carthage | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,562 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $42,788 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 6,562 in Carthage.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $42,788 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carthage at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 5.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 4 |
| White | 59 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 12% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Carthage.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 17% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 11% in Carthage.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 42.1% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Coalinga
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 24.6% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 19.6% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carthage at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 42.1% compared to 39.1% in Coalinga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (148) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (705) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (1,343) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (600) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 2.3% in Carthage.
- In Coalinga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 10.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 20.5% in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.