Demographics details for Carthage, MS vs Waynesfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MS vs Waynesfield, OH.
Data | Carthage | Waynesfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,813 | 736 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $47,722 | $63,750 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Waynesfield
- In Carthage, the population is higher at 4,813, compared to 736 in Waynesfield.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.4 years in Waynesfield.
- Waynesfield has a higher median income of $63,750, compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- In Waynesfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Waynesfield.
- Waynesfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Waynesfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carthage | Waynesfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 45 | 1 |
White | 36 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 3 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Waynesfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 45% compared to 1% in Waynesfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waynesfield at 91% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- Both Carthage and Waynesfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 18% compared to 3% in Waynesfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waynesfield at 5%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carthage at 1% compared to 0% in Waynesfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carthage | Waynesfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 11.4% |
Depression | 21.6% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 19.6% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 46.5% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Waynesfield
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.3% in Waynesfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waynesfield at 23.2% versus 21.6% in Carthage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 25.3% compared to 19.6% in Waynesfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waynesfield at 19.3% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 46.5% compared to 37.4% in Waynesfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 7.0% in Waynesfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carthage | Waynesfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (145) | 1.8% (13) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (806) | 24.3% (179) |
Less than High School | 16.9% (811) | 9.8% (72) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (583) | 10.2% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Waynesfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.8% in Waynesfield.
- In Waynesfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.3% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 9.8% in Waynesfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 10.2% in Waynesfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.