Demographics details for Carthage, MS vs Portland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MS vs Portland, TX.
| Data | Carthage | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,813 | 20,350 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $47,722 | $83,493 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Portland
- The population in Portland is higher at 20,350, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 34.2 years in Portland.
- Portland has a higher median income of $83,493, compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- In Portland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Portland.
- The unemployment rate in Carthage is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Portland.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 2 |
| White | 36 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Portland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 45% compared to 2% in Portland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Portland at 38% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- In Portland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
- Portland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 18% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Portland at 15%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carthage at 1% compared to 0% in Portland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 46.5% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Portland
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Portland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Portland at 22.2% versus 21.6% in Carthage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 25.3% compared to 13.9% in Portland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Portland at 20.2% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 46.5% compared to 37.6% in Portland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Portland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (145) | 0.3% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (806) | 16.1% (3,277) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (811) | 9.4% (1,904) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (583) | 17.4% (3,539) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Portland
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in Portland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Portland.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 9.4% in Portland.
- In Portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.