Demographics details for Carthage, MS vs Pasadena, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MS vs Pasadena, TX.
| Data | Carthage | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,813 | 147,662 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,722 | $64,698 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Pasadena
- The population in Pasadena is higher at 147,662, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 32.6 years in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher median income of $64,698, compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- In Pasadena, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 3 |
| White | 36 | -1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 72 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 23 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Pasadena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 45% compared to 3% in Pasadena.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to -1% in Pasadena.
- In Pasadena, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
- Pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 72%, compared to 18% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pasadena at 23%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carthage and Pasadena at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 46.5% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Pasadena
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.6% in Pasadena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pasadena at 21.7% versus 21.6% in Carthage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 25.3% compared to 18.0% in Pasadena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pasadena at 18.1% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 46.5% compared to 37.9% in Pasadena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (145) | 3.0% (4,357) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (806) | 16.2% (23,948) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (811) | 33.1% (48,806) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (583) | 9.9% (14,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Pasadena
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Carthage and Pasadena at 3.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 16.2% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pasadena at 33.1%, compared to 16.9% in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 9.9% in Pasadena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.