Demographics details for Carthage, MS vs La porte, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MS vs La porte, IN.

Data Carthage La porte
Population 4,813 22,198
Median Age 36.4 years 35.0 years
Median Income $47,722 $55,031
Married Families 23.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Carthage vs La porte

  • The population in La porte is higher at 22,198, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
  • Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.0 years in La porte.
  • La porte has a higher median income of $55,031, compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
  • In La porte, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
  • Carthage has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in La porte.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Carthage and La porte at 4.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Carthage vs La porte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carthage La porte
Black 45 3
White 36 75
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 18 13
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs La porte

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 45% compared to 3% in La porte.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in La porte at 75% compared to 36% in Carthage.
  • In La porte, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 18% compared to 13% in La porte.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La porte at 8%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carthage at 1% compared to 0% in La porte.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carthage La porte
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.8% 13.2%
Depression 21.6% 27.3%
Smoking 25.3% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 12.5% 16.7%
Obesity 46.5% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs La porte

  • More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.2% in La porte.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in La porte at 27.3% versus 21.6% in Carthage.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 25.3% compared to 22.1% in La porte.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in La porte at 16.7% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 46.5% compared to 36.6% in La porte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in La porte.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carthage La porte
No Schooling 3.0% (145) 0.8% (173)
High School Diploma 16.7% (806) 21.2% (4,715)
Less than High School 16.9% (811) 16.1% (3,566)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.1% (583) 12.1% (2,694)

Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs La porte

  • A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.8% in La porte.
  • In La porte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
  • More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 16.1% in La porte.
  • The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Carthage and La porte at 12.1%.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.