Demographics details for Carthage, MS vs Gotha, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MS vs Gotha, FL.
| Data | Carthage | Gotha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,813 | 1,640 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,722 | $174,750 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Gotha
- In Carthage, the population is higher at 4,813, compared to 1,640 in Gotha.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 28.9 years in Gotha.
- Gotha has a higher median income of $174,750, compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- In Gotha, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Gotha.
- Gotha has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Gotha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Gotha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 26 |
| White | 36 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Gotha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 45% compared to 26% in Gotha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gotha at 40% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- In Gotha, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 18% compared to 11% in Gotha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gotha at 11%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carthage at 1% compared to 0% in Gotha.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Gotha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 13.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 46.5% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 1.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Gotha
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Gotha.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 21.6% compared to 16.6% in Gotha.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 25.3% compared to 13.4% in Gotha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gotha at 15.6% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 46.5% compared to 24.5% in Gotha.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 1.0% in Gotha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Gotha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (145) | 1.5% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (806) | 6.2% (102) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (811) | 1.5% (25) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (583) | 34.7% (569) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Gotha
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.5% in Gotha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 6.2% in Gotha.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 1.5% in Gotha.
- In Gotha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.