Demographics details for Carthage, MS vs Flower mound, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MS vs Flower mound, TX.
Data | Carthage | Flower mound |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,813 | 78,486 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 42.6 years |
Median Income | $47,722 | $154,471 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Flower mound
- The population in Flower mound is higher at 78,486, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Flower mound is higher at 42.6 years, compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Flower mound has a higher median income of $154,471, compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- In Flower mound, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Flower mound.
- The unemployment rate in Carthage is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Flower mound.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Flower mound provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carthage | Flower mound |
---|---|---|
Black | 45 | 3 |
White | 36 | 66 |
Asian | Data is updating | 13 |
Hispanic | 18 | 11 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Flower mound
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 45% compared to 3% in Flower mound.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flower mound at 66% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- In Flower mound, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 18% compared to 11% in Flower mound.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flower mound at 7%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carthage at 1% compared to 0% in Flower mound.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carthage | Flower mound |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 7.7% |
Depression | 21.6% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 9.5% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 46.5% | 28.5% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Flower mound
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.3% in Flower mound.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 21.6% compared to 21.1% in Flower mound.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 25.3% compared to 9.5% in Flower mound.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Flower mound at 19.7% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 46.5% compared to 28.5% in Flower mound.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Flower mound.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carthage | Flower mound |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (145) | 0.7% (519) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (806) | 6.2% (4,886) |
Less than High School | 16.9% (811) | 2.7% (2,090) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (583) | 42.3% (33,161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Flower mound
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.7% in Flower mound.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 6.2% in Flower mound.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 2.7% in Flower mound.
- In Flower mound, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.