Demographics details for Carthage, MO vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MO vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Carthage | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,491 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $43,526 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 15,491 in Carthage.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher median income of $43,526 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 14% in Carthage.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 31 |
| White | 52 | 38 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 2% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carthage at 33% compared to 16% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 10% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carthage at 2% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Lexington
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.2% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 26.7% compared to 25.0% in Lexington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 24.9% compared to 24.1% in Lexington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carthage at 15.0% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 42.7%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (576) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (2,032) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 30.4% (4,717) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (2,006) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.7% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.1% in Carthage.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 30.4% compared to 25.6% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.