Demographics details for Carthage, MO vs Franklin park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, MO vs Franklin park, IL.
| Data | Carthage | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,491 | 18,059 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,526 | $74,167 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Franklin park
- The population in Franklin park is higher at 18,059, compared to 15,491 in Carthage.
- The median age in Franklin park is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
- Franklin park has a higher median income of $74,167, compared to $43,526 in Carthage.
- In Franklin park, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Franklin park.
- Franklin park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Franklin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carthage | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 52 | 10 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 23 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Franklin park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carthage at 2% compared to 1% in Franklin park.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
- In Franklin park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Carthage.
- Franklin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 33% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Franklin park at 23%, compared to 10% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carthage and Franklin park at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carthage | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Franklin park
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.2% in Franklin park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 26.7% compared to 17.7% in Franklin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 24.9% compared to 14.4% in Franklin park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin park at 18.9% compared to 15.0% in Carthage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 42.7% compared to 30.9% in Franklin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Franklin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carthage | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (576) | 2.5% (453) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (2,032) | 17.0% (3,067) |
| Less than High School | 30.4% (4,717) | 30.2% (5,452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (2,006) | 12.7% (2,297) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Franklin park
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.5% in Franklin park.
- In Franklin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.1% in Carthage.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 30.4% compared to 30.2% in Franklin park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 12.7% in Franklin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.