Demographics details for Carthage, IN vs Pascagoula, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, IN vs Pascagoula, MS.
Data | Carthage | Pascagoula |
---|---|---|
Population | 917 | 21,650 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $43,958 | $41,679 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Carthage vs Pascagoula
- The population in Pascagoula is higher at 21,650, compared to 917 in Carthage.
- Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 34.8 years in Pascagoula.
- Carthage has a higher median income of $43,958 compared to $41,679 in Pascagoula.
- In Pascagoula, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 24.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Pascagoula at 16%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Pascagoula has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Carthage vs Pascagoula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carthage | Pascagoula |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 37 |
White | 98 | 45 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 45% in Pascagoula.
- In Pascagoula, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
- Pascagoula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pascagoula at 4%, compared to 2% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carthage and Pascagoula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carthage | Pascagoula |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 27.3% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 21.2% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Pascagoula
- More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Pascagoula.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 27.3% compared to 22.5% in Pascagoula.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 21.2% compared to 20.8% in Pascagoula.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carthage at 17.3% compared to 14.2% in Pascagoula.
- Pascagoula has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.6% in Carthage.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Pascagoula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carthage | Pascagoula |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (8) | 1.1% (237) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (169) | 15.1% (3,262) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (140) | 12.2% (2,644) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.2% (20) | 11.6% (2,521) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Pascagoula.
- More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 12.2% in Pascagoula.
- In Pascagoula, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 2.2% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.