Demographics details for Carthage, IN vs Harker heights, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carthage, IN vs Harker heights, TX.

Data Carthage Harker heights
Population 917 34,102
Median Age 38.0 years 34.5 years
Median Income $43,958 $72,258
Married Families 24.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Carthage vs Harker heights

  • The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 917 in Carthage.
  • Residents in Carthage have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258, compared to $43,958 in Carthage.
  • In Harker heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 24.0% in Carthage.
  • The poverty level is higher in Harker heights at 9%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
  • Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Carthage.

Demographics

Demographics Carthage vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carthage Harker heights
Black Data is updating 28
White 98 36
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 21
Two or More Races 2 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Carthage vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Carthage.
  • Carthage has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Carthage.
  • Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 0% in Carthage.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 2% in Carthage.
  • In Harker heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carthage.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carthage Harker heights
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 10.8%
Depression 27.3% 22.5%
Smoking 21.2% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 17.1%
Obesity 38.6% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carthage vs Harker heights

  • More residents in Carthage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.5% in Harker heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carthage at 27.3% compared to 22.5% in Harker heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carthage at 21.2% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Carthage at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Carthage at 38.6% compared to 37.1% in Harker heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carthage at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carthage Harker heights
No Schooling 0.9% (8) 1.3% (448)
High School Diploma 18.4% (169) 11.6% (3,958)
Less than High School 15.3% (140) 10.3% (3,509)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.2% (20) 18.8% (6,403)

Education Levels Comparison: Carthage vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Carthage.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carthage hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • More residents in Carthage have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 2.2% in Carthage.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.