Demographics details for Carson, CA vs Clarkesville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carson, CA vs Clarkesville, GA.
| Data | Carson | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,388 | 2,112 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $103,045 | $64,848 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Carson vs Clarkesville
- In Carson, the population is higher at 92,388, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- The median age in Clarkesville is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 41.3 years in Carson.
- Carson has a higher median income of $103,045 compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carson at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- Carson has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- The unemployment rate in Carson is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Carson vs Clarkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carson | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 8 |
| White | -5 | 81 |
| Asian | 26 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 41 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carson vs Clarkesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carson at 23% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarkesville at 81% compared to -5% in Carson.
- The Asian population is larger in Carson at 26% compared to 1% in Clarkesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carson at 41% compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carson at 14% compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carson at 1% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carson | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 13.4% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carson vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.2% in Carson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarkesville at 23.6% versus 13.4% in Carson.
- Clarkesville has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 10.2% in Carson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 13.9% in Carson.
- Clarkesville has higher obesity rates at 31.5% compared to 27.4% in Carson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Carson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carson | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (3,018) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (13,240) | 16.9% (356) |
| Less than High School | 22.9% (21,161) | 15.2% (322) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (19,977) | 21.4% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carson vs Clarkesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Carson have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- In Clarkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 14.3% in Carson.
- More residents in Carson have less than a high school education at 22.9% compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 21.4% in Clarkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.