Demographics details for Carson city, NV vs Palos park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carson city, NV vs Palos park, IL.

Data Carson city Palos park
Population 58,130 4,792
Median Age 42.1 years 59.5 years
Median Income $67,465 $128,370
Married Families 38.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.4 5.0

Population Comparison: Carson city vs Palos park

  • In Carson city, the population is higher at 58,130, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
  • The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 42.1 years in Carson city.
  • Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $67,465 in Carson city.
  • In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 38.0% in Carson city.
  • Carson city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Palos park.
  • The unemployment rate in Carson city is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.0% in Palos park.

Demographics

Demographics Carson city vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carson city Palos park
Black 2 3
White 58 88
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 25 3
Two or More Races 10 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carson city vs Palos park

  • In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Carson city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 58% in Carson city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Carson city at 3% compared to 1% in Palos park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Carson city at 25% compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Carson city at 10% compared to 5% in Palos park.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carson city at 2% compared to 0% in Palos park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carson city Palos park
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 8.4%
Depression 21.5% 18.5%
Smoking 17.8% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 20.8%
Obesity 32.6% 26.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carson city vs Palos park

  • More residents in Carson city report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carson city at 21.5% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carson city at 17.8% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Carson city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Carson city at 32.6% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carson city at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carson city Palos park
No Schooling 1.2% (690) 1.1% (54)
High School Diploma 14.9% (8,674) 18.2% (870)
Less than High School 15.4% (8,968) 6.0% (287)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.6% (10,205) 42.1% (2,018)

Education Levels Comparison: Carson city vs Palos park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Carson city have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
  • In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.9% in Carson city.
  • More residents in Carson city have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
  • In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 17.6% in Carson city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.