Demographics details for Carson city, NV vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carson city, NV vs Live oak, FL.
Data | Carson city | Live oak |
---|---|---|
Population | 58,130 | 7,034 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $67,465 | $43,664 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Carson city vs Live oak
- In Carson city, the population is higher at 58,130, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- Residents in Carson city have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Carson city has a higher median income of $67,465 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carson city at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 12% in Carson city.
- The unemployment rate in Carson city is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Carson city vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carson city | Live oak |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 38 |
White | 58 | 41 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 12 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carson city vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 2% in Carson city.
- Carson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Carson city at 3% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carson city at 25% compared to 9% in Live oak.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 10% in Carson city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carson city at 2% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carson city | Live oak |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 12.4% |
Depression | 21.5% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 32.6% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carson city vs Live oak
- More residents in Carson city report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carson city at 21.5% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.8% in Carson city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carson city at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 32.6% in Carson city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carson city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carson city | Live oak |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (690) | 2.1% (147) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (8,674) | 25.0% (1,755) |
Less than High School | 15.4% (8,968) | 11.3% (796) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (10,205) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carson city vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.2% in Carson city.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 14.9% in Carson city.
- More residents in Carson city have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carson city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.