Demographics details for Carson city, NV vs Decker, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carson city, NV vs Decker, MI.
Data | Carson city | Decker |
---|---|---|
Population | 58,130 | 953 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $67,465 | $56,875 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Carson city vs Decker
- In Carson city, the population is higher at 58,130, compared to 953 in Decker.
- Residents in Carson city have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 35.1 years in Decker.
- Carson city has a higher median income of $67,465 compared to $56,875 in Decker.
- In Decker, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Carson city.
- Carson city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Decker.
- The unemployment rate in Carson city is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.2% in Decker.
Demographics
Demographics Carson city vs Decker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carson city | Decker |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 58 | 98 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carson city vs Decker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carson city at 2% compared to 1% in Decker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Decker at 98% compared to 58% in Carson city.
- The Asian population is larger in Carson city at 3% compared to 0% in Decker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carson city at 25% compared to 0% in Decker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carson city at 10% compared to 1% in Decker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carson city at 2% compared to 0% in Decker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carson city | Decker |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 21.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 32.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carson city vs Decker
- More residents in Carson city report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carson city at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carson city at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carson city at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carson city at 32.6% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carson city at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Decker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carson city | Decker |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (690) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (8,674) | 19.9% (190) |
Less than High School | 15.4% (8,968) | 17.0% (162) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (10,205) | 6.9% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carson city vs Decker
- A higher percentage of residents in Carson city have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- In Decker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 14.9% in Carson city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Decker at 17.0%, compared to 15.4% in Carson city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carson city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 6.9% in Decker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.