Demographics details for Carson city, MI vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carson city, MI vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data Carson city Fort lupton
Population 1,120 8,829
Median Age 45.8 years 35.9 years
Median Income $42,222 $71,293
Married Families 24.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Carson city vs Fort lupton

  • The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 1,120 in Carson city.
  • Residents in Carson city have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $42,222 in Carson city.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 24.0% in Carson city.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Carson city and Fort lupton at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Carson city and Fort lupton at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Carson city vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carson city Fort lupton
Black 1 Data is updating
White 94 26
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 53
Two or More Races 2 20
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Carson city vs Fort lupton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carson city at 1% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Carson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • Both Carson city and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 3% in Carson city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 2% in Carson city.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carson city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carson city Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 11.8%
Depression 27.6% 19.9%
Smoking 21.9% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 17.0%
Obesity 37.3% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carson city vs Fort lupton

  • More residents in Carson city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carson city at 27.6% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carson city at 21.9% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Carson city at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Carson city at 37.3% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carson city at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carson city Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 19.1% (214) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 7.5% (84) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.4% (105) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: Carson city vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Carson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carson city hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 7.5% in Carson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carson city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.