Demographics details for Carson city, MI vs College park, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carson city, MI vs College park, MD.

Data Carson city College park
Population 1,120 34,190
Median Age 45.8 years 21.6 years
Median Income $42,222 $76,973
Married Families 24.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.5

Population Comparison: Carson city vs College park

  • The population in College park is higher at 34,190, compared to 1,120 in Carson city.
  • Residents in Carson city have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
  • College park has a higher median income of $76,973, compared to $42,222 in Carson city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Carson city at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Carson city and College park at 10%.
  • College park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Carson city.

Demographics

Demographics Carson city vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carson city College park
Black 1 23
White 94 39
Asian Data is updating 14
Hispanic 3 17
Two or More Races 2 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carson city vs College park

  • In College park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Carson city.
  • Carson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 39% in College park.
  • In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Carson city.
  • College park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 3% in Carson city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in College park at 7%, compared to 2% in Carson city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carson city and College park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carson city College park
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 10.0%
Depression 27.6% 15.4%
Smoking 21.9% 12.4%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 12.8%
Obesity 37.3% 36.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carson city vs College park

  • More residents in Carson city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.8% in College park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carson city at 27.6% compared to 15.4% in College park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carson city at 21.9% compared to 12.4% in College park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Carson city at 17.6% compared to 12.8% in College park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Carson city at 37.3% compared to 36.4% in College park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carson city at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carson city College park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.9% (657)
High School Diploma 19.1% (214) 6.4% (2,199)
Less than High School 7.5% (84) 9.4% (3,210)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.4% (105) 19.8% (6,769)

Education Levels Comparison: Carson city vs College park

  • In College park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Carson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carson city hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 6.4% in College park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in College park at 9.4%, compared to 7.5% in Carson city.
  • In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 9.4% in Carson city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.