Demographics details for Carson city, MI vs Bowie, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carson city, MI vs Bowie, MD.
Data | Carson city | Bowie |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,120 | 57,192 |
Median Age | 45.8 years | 43.2 years |
Median Income | $42,222 | $138,797 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Carson city vs Bowie
- The population in Bowie is higher at 57,192, compared to 1,120 in Carson city.
- Residents in Carson city have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 43.2 years in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $138,797, compared to $42,222 in Carson city.
- In Bowie, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 24.0% in Carson city.
- Carson city has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Bowie.
- The unemployment rate in Carson city is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Bowie.
Demographics
Demographics Carson city vs Bowie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carson city | Bowie |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 58 |
White | 94 | 24 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carson city vs Bowie
- In Bowie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 1% in Carson city.
- Carson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 24% in Bowie.
- In Bowie, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Carson city.
- Bowie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Carson city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bowie at 7%, compared to 2% in Carson city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carson city and Bowie at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carson city | Bowie |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 12.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 7.4% |
Depression | 27.6% | 13.3% |
Smoking | 21.9% | 8.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 35.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carson city vs Bowie
- More residents in Carson city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.4% in Bowie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carson city at 27.6% compared to 13.3% in Bowie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carson city at 21.9% compared to 8.7% in Bowie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carson city at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Bowie.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carson city at 37.3% compared to 35.1% in Bowie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carson city at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carson city | Bowie |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (531) |
High School Diploma | 19.1% (214) | 12.2% (6,950) |
Less than High School | 7.5% (84) | 5.9% (3,399) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (105) | 35.9% (20,525) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carson city vs Bowie
- In Bowie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Carson city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carson city hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 12.2% in Bowie.
- More residents in Carson city have less than a high school education at 7.5% compared to 5.9% in Bowie.
- In Bowie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 9.4% in Carson city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.