Demographics details for Carrollton, TX vs Sanford, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, TX vs Sanford, ME.
| Data | Carrollton | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 133,820 | 22,266 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $95,380 | $71,848 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Sanford
- In Carrollton, the population is higher at 133,820, compared to 22,266 in Sanford.
- The median age in Sanford is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 38.6 years in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380 compared to $71,848 in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carrollton at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Sanford.
- Carrollton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Sanford.
- The unemployment rate in Carrollton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Carrollton vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carrollton | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 89 |
| Asian | 15 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 10% compared to 1% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sanford at 89% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrollton at 15% compared to 2% in Sanford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrollton at 32% compared to 3% in Sanford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carrollton at 12% compared to 5% in Sanford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carrollton and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carrollton | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sanford at 25.3% versus 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Sanford has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Carrollton.
- Sanford has higher obesity rates at 33.4% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanford at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carrollton | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (2,169) | 0.4% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (16,432) | 21.5% (4,797) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (17,673) | 12.1% (2,692) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.8% (39,921) | 15.7% (3,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
- More residents in Carrollton have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 12.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 15.7% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.