Demographics details for Carrollton, TX vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, TX vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Carrollton | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 133,820 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $95,380 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Parker
- In Carrollton, the population is higher at 133,820, compared to 61,222 in Parker.
- Residents in Carrollton have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $95,380 in Carrollton.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.7% in Carrollton.
Demographics
Demographics Carrollton vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carrollton | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 2 |
| White | 31 | 73 |
| Asian | 15 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 10% compared to 2% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 73% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrollton at 15% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrollton at 32% compared to 12% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carrollton at 12% compared to 8% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carrollton and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carrollton | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Parker
- More residents in Carrollton report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carrollton at 20.9% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carrollton at 13.5% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Carrollton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carrollton at 31.5% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carrollton at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carrollton | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (2,169) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (16,432) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (17,673) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.8% (39,921) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- More residents in Carrollton have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 29.8% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.