Demographics details for Carrollton, TX vs Jurupa valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, TX vs Jurupa valley, CA.
| Data | Carrollton | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 133,820 | 107,609 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $95,380 | $91,562 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Jurupa valley
- In Carrollton, the population is higher at 133,820, compared to 107,609 in Jurupa valley.
- Residents in Carrollton have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380 compared to $91,562 in Jurupa valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carrollton at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Jurupa valley at 12%, compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.7% in Carrollton.
Demographics
Demographics Carrollton vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carrollton | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 3 |
| White | 31 | 8 |
| Asian | 15 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 71 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Jurupa valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 10% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrollton at 15% compared to 4% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 32% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 12% in Carrollton.
- In Jurupa valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carrollton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carrollton | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carrollton at 20.9% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carrollton at 17.7% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jurupa valley at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carrollton | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (2,169) | 3.1% (3,376) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (16,432) | 17.3% (18,582) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (17,673) | 34.3% (36,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.8% (39,921) | 9.0% (9,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.6% in Carrollton.
- In Jurupa valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 13.2% in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.