Demographics details for Carrollton, TX vs Fort atkinson, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, TX vs Fort atkinson, WI.

Data Carrollton Fort atkinson
Population 133,820 12,412
Median Age 38.6 years 42.0 years
Median Income $95,380 $72,215
Married Families 44.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 9% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.2

Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Fort atkinson

  • In Carrollton, the population is higher at 133,820, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.6 years in Carrollton.
  • Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380 compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Carrollton at 44.0% compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Carrollton and Fort atkinson at 9%.
  • The unemployment rate in Carrollton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Carrollton vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carrollton Fort atkinson
Black 10 Data is updating
White 31 89
Asian 15 Data is updating
Hispanic 32 8
Two or More Races 12 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 10% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Carrollton at 15% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Carrollton at 32% compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Carrollton at 12% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carrollton and Fort atkinson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carrollton Fort atkinson
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 10.2%
Depression 20.9% 23.6%
Smoking 13.5% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 23.5%
Obesity 31.5% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fort atkinson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 20.9% in Carrollton.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 17.7% in Carrollton.
  • Fort atkinson has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carrollton Fort atkinson
No Schooling 1.6% (2,169) 1.3% (160)
High School Diploma 12.3% (16,432) 20.8% (2,578)
Less than High School 13.2% (17,673) 12.9% (1,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.8% (39,921) 19.6% (2,436)

Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
  • More residents in Carrollton have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.