Demographics details for Carrollton, TX vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, TX vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Carrollton | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 133,820 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $95,380 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Cochran
- In Carrollton, the population is higher at 133,820, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Carrollton have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carrollton at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- The unemployment rate in Carrollton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Carrollton vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carrollton | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 53 |
| White | 31 | 40 |
| Asian | 15 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 10% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochran at 40% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrollton at 15% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrollton at 32% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carrollton at 12% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carrollton and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carrollton | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carrollton at 17.7% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carrollton | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (2,169) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (16,432) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (17,673) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.8% (39,921) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Cochran
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 13.2% in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.