Demographics details for Carrollton, GA vs Two rivers, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, GA vs Two rivers, WI.
Data | Carrollton | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,262 | 11,166 |
Median Age | 27.5 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $46,722 | $56,236 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Two rivers
- In Carrollton, the population is higher at 27,262, compared to 11,166 in Two rivers.
- The median age in Two rivers is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
- Two rivers has a higher median income of $56,236, compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
- In Two rivers, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Two rivers.
- The unemployment rate in Carrollton is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.1% in Two rivers.
Demographics
Demographics Carrollton vs Two rivers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carrollton | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
Black | 36 | 2 |
White | 47 | 86 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Two rivers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 36% compared to 2% in Two rivers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Two rivers at 86% compared to 47% in Carrollton.
- Both Carrollton and Two rivers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrollton at 9% compared to 6% in Two rivers.
- Both Carrollton and Two rivers have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carrollton at 2% compared to 0% in Two rivers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carrollton | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 10.8% |
Depression | 20.9% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 23.7% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Two rivers
- More residents in Carrollton report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Two rivers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Two rivers at 24.3% versus 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carrollton at 19.2% compared to 18.0% in Two rivers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Two rivers at 23.7% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carrollton at 37.8% compared to 36.7% in Two rivers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Two rivers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carrollton | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (212) | 0.7% (83) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,426) | 24.6% (2,745) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (3,126) | 8.7% (974) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,617) | 17.1% (1,912) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Two rivers
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Two rivers.
- In Two rivers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 12.6% in Carrollton.
- More residents in Carrollton have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 8.7% in Two rivers.
- In Two rivers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.