Demographics details for Carrollton, GA vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, GA vs Thornton, CO.
Data | Carrollton | Thornton |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,262 | 143,282 |
Median Age | 27.5 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $46,722 | $95,064 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Thornton
- The population in Thornton is higher at 143,282, compared to 27,262 in Carrollton.
- The median age in Thornton is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064, compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
- In Thornton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Thornton.
- The unemployment rate in Carrollton is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Carrollton vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carrollton | Thornton |
---|---|---|
Black | 36 | 2 |
White | 47 | 39 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 9 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Thornton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 36% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Carrollton.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 15%, compared to 5% in Carrollton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carrollton at 2% compared to 1% in Thornton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carrollton | Thornton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 10.9% |
Depression | 20.9% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 21.0% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Thornton
- More residents in Carrollton report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Thornton at 22.0% versus 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carrollton at 19.2% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carrollton at 37.8% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carrollton | Thornton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (212) | 1.7% (2,448) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,426) | 13.2% (18,983) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (3,126) | 14.7% (20,999) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,617) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Carrollton.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 12.6% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 14.7%, compared to 11.5% in Carrollton.
- In Thornton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.