Demographics details for Carrollton, GA vs Essex junction, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carrollton, GA vs Essex junction, VT.

Data Carrollton Essex junction
Population 27,262 10,917
Median Age 27.5 years 39.9 years
Median Income $46,722 $92,589
Married Families 27.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 15% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 2.5

Population Comparison: Carrollton vs Essex junction

  • In Carrollton, the population is higher at 27,262, compared to 10,917 in Essex junction.
  • The median age in Essex junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
  • Essex junction has a higher median income of $92,589, compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
  • In Essex junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
  • Carrollton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Essex junction.
  • The unemployment rate in Carrollton is higher at 5.4%, compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.

Demographics

Demographics Carrollton vs Essex junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carrollton Essex junction
Black 36 3
White 47 79
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 9 2
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carrollton vs Essex junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrollton at 36% compared to 3% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Essex junction at 79% compared to 47% in Carrollton.
  • In Essex junction, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Carrollton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Carrollton at 9% compared to 2% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Essex junction at 8%, compared to 5% in Carrollton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carrollton at 2% compared to 0% in Essex junction.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carrollton Essex junction
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 8.1%
Depression 20.9% 27.1%
Smoking 19.2% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 14.7% 20.9%
Obesity 37.8% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carrollton vs Essex junction

  • More residents in Carrollton report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.1% in Essex junction.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Essex junction at 27.1% versus 20.9% in Carrollton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carrollton at 19.2% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Carrollton at 37.8% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Essex junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carrollton Essex junction
No Schooling 0.8% (212) 1.5% (162)
High School Diploma 12.6% (3,426) 8.2% (899)
Less than High School 11.5% (3,126) 8.8% (966)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.9% (4,617) 34.3% (3,742)

Education Levels Comparison: Carrollton vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Carrollton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carrollton hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
  • More residents in Carrollton have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 8.8% in Essex junction.
  • In Essex junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.