Demographics details for Carroll, NE vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carroll, NE vs Fort smith, AR.
| Data | Carroll | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 191 | 89,992 |
| Median Age | 34.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,813 | $50,799 |
| Married Families | 77.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Carroll vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 191 in Carroll.
- The median age in Fort smith is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.0 years in Carroll.
- Carroll has a higher median income of $57,813 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carroll at 77.0% compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort smith at 12%, compared to 9% in Carroll.
- Fort smith has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Carroll.
Demographics
Demographics Carroll vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carroll | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 90 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carroll vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Carroll.
- Carroll has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Carroll.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 6% in Carroll.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort smith at 9%, compared to 3% in Carroll.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carroll.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carroll | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 16.0% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carroll vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 12.5% in Carroll.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 16.0% in Carroll.
- Fort smith has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 13.7% in Carroll.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carroll at 24.2% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.6% in Carroll.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carroll at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Fort smith.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carroll | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.3% (2,029) |
| High School Diploma | 26.7% (51) | 14.8% (13,356) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (26) | 19.8% (17,822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (24) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carroll vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Carroll.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carroll hold a high school diploma at 26.7% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort smith at 19.8%, compared to 13.6% in Carroll.
- In Fort smith, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 12.6% in Carroll.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.