Demographics details for Carrboro, NC vs Woods hole, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrboro, NC vs Woods hole, MA.
Data | Carrboro | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,298 | 992 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 65.8 years |
Median Income | $76,933 | $72,031 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Carrboro vs Woods hole
- In Carrboro, the population is higher at 21,298, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
- The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Carrboro has a higher median income of $76,933 compared to $72,031 in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carrboro at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
- Carrboro has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Woods hole.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Carrboro and Woods hole at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Carrboro vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carrboro | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | Data is updating |
White | 61 | 96 |
Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carrboro vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrboro at 14% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 61% in Carrboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrboro at 9% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrboro at 8% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carrboro at 7% compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carrboro at 1% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carrboro | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 7.3% |
Depression | 20.5% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 10.3% | 9.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 27.4% | 26.0% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrboro vs Woods hole
- In Woods hole, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woods hole at 21.5% versus 20.5% in Carrboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carrboro at 10.3% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 17.5% in Carrboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carrboro at 27.4% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woods hole at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Carrboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carrboro | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (273) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 4.1% (868) | 7.4% (73) |
Less than High School | 4.6% (984) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.7% (9,945) | 67.2% (667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrboro vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrboro have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Woods hole, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.4% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- More residents in Carrboro have less than a high school education at 4.6% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 46.7% in Carrboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.