Demographics details for Carrboro, NC vs Wasilla, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrboro, NC vs Wasilla, AK.
| Data | Carrboro | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,298 | 9,711 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $76,933 | $69,534 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Carrboro vs Wasilla
- In Carrboro, the population is higher at 21,298, compared to 9,711 in Wasilla.
- The median age in Wasilla is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Carrboro has a higher median income of $76,933 compared to $69,534 in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carrboro at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Wasilla.
- Carrboro has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Wasilla.
- The unemployment rate in Carrboro is higher at 3.5%, compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
Demographics
Demographics Carrboro vs Wasilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carrboro | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 74 |
| Asian | 9 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Carrboro vs Wasilla
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrboro at 14% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wasilla at 74% compared to 61% in Carrboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrboro at 9% compared to 3% in Wasilla.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrboro at 8% compared to 6% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wasilla at 9%, compared to 7% in Carrboro.
- In Wasilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in Carrboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carrboro | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrboro vs Wasilla
- In Wasilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wasilla at 23.2% versus 20.5% in Carrboro.
- Wasilla has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 10.3% in Carrboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wasilla at 18.3% compared to 17.5% in Carrboro.
- Wasilla has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 27.4% in Carrboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wasilla at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Carrboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carrboro | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (273) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.1% (868) | 21.1% (2,051) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (984) | 5.3% (514) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.7% (9,945) | 13.3% (1,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrboro vs Wasilla
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrboro have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
- In Wasilla, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wasilla at 5.3%, compared to 4.6% in Carrboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 13.3% in Wasilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.