Demographics details for Carrboro, NC vs Fairhope, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carrboro, NC vs Fairhope, AL.
| Data | Carrboro | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,298 | 23,859 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $76,933 | $85,456 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Carrboro vs Fairhope
- The population in Fairhope is higher at 23,859, compared to 21,298 in Carrboro.
- The median age in Fairhope is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456, compared to $76,933 in Carrboro.
- In Fairhope, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 38.0% in Carrboro.
- Carrboro has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- The unemployment rate in Carrboro is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Carrboro vs Fairhope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carrboro | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 4 |
| White | 61 | 89 |
| Asian | 9 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carrboro vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carrboro at 14% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairhope at 89% compared to 61% in Carrboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Carrboro at 9% compared to 1% in Fairhope.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carrboro at 8% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carrboro at 7% compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carrboro at 1% compared to 0% in Fairhope.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carrboro | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carrboro vs Fairhope
- In Fairhope, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairhope at 22.6% versus 20.5% in Carrboro.
- Fairhope has a higher smoking rate at 12.0% compared to 10.3% in Carrboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 17.5% in Carrboro.
- Fairhope has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 27.4% in Carrboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairhope at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Carrboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carrboro | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (273) | 0.3% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 4.1% (868) | 7.1% (1,686) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (984) | 4.6% (1,098) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.7% (9,945) | 35.8% (8,552) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carrboro vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrboro have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- In Fairhope, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.1% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 4.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carrboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 35.8% in Fairhope.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.