Demographics details for Carmichaels, PA vs Park forest, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carmichaels, PA vs Park forest, IL.
Data | Carmichaels | Park forest |
---|---|---|
Population | 416 | 20,954 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $80,909 | $58,907 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 8.9 |
Population Comparison: Carmichaels vs Park forest
- The population in Park forest is higher at 20,954, compared to 416 in Carmichaels.
- Residents in Carmichaels have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Carmichaels has a higher median income of $80,909 compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carmichaels at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- The poverty level is higher in Park forest at 13%, compared to 8% in Carmichaels.
- Park forest has a higher unemployment rate at 8.9% compared to 5.0% in Carmichaels.
Demographics
Demographics Carmichaels vs Park forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carmichaels | Park forest |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 72 |
White | 91 | 17 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carmichaels vs Park forest
- In Park forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 0% in Carmichaels.
- Carmichaels has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- Both Carmichaels and Park forest have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Park forest has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Carmichaels.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carmichaels at 6% compared to 3% in Park forest.
- In Park forest, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carmichaels.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carmichaels | Park forest |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 11.2% |
Depression | 24.7% | 16.9% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 15.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 37.0% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carmichaels vs Park forest
- More residents in Carmichaels report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carmichaels at 24.7% compared to 16.9% in Park forest.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carmichaels at 21.7% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carmichaels at 18.4% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Park forest has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 37.0% in Carmichaels.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carmichaels at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Park forest.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carmichaels | Park forest |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.4% (503) |
High School Diploma | 27.6% (115) | 13.4% (2,802) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (60) | 8.5% (1,787) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (61) | 17.4% (3,650) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carmichaels vs Park forest
- In Park forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Carmichaels.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carmichaels hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- More residents in Carmichaels have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- In Park forest, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 14.7% in Carmichaels.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.