Demographics details for Carmichaels, PA vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carmichaels, PA vs Junction city, KS.

Data Carmichaels Junction city
Population 416 22,264
Median Age 49.5 years 28.5 years
Median Income $80,909 $60,709
Married Families 45.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 8% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.8

Population Comparison: Carmichaels vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 416 in Carmichaels.
  • Residents in Carmichaels have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Carmichaels has a higher median income of $80,909 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Carmichaels at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 8% in Carmichaels.
  • The unemployment rate in Carmichaels is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.8% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Carmichaels vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carmichaels Junction city
Black Data is updating 20
White 91 43
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 3 18
Two or More Races 6 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Carmichaels vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Carmichaels.
  • Carmichaels has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Carmichaels.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Carmichaels.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 6% in Carmichaels.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carmichaels.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carmichaels Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 11.0%
Depression 24.7% 19.2%
Smoking 21.7% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 16.6%
Obesity 37.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carmichaels vs Junction city

  • More residents in Carmichaels report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carmichaels at 24.7% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Carmichaels at 21.7% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Carmichaels at 18.4% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 37.0% in Carmichaels.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carmichaels at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carmichaels Junction city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 27.6% (115) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 14.4% (60) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.7% (61) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Carmichaels vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Carmichaels.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carmichaels hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • More residents in Carmichaels have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carmichaels hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.7% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.