Demographics details for Carmel, IN vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carmel, IN vs Woodstock, GA.
| Data | Carmel | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,964 | 37,350 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $132,859 | $100,913 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Carmel vs Woodstock
- In Carmel, the population is higher at 101,964, compared to 37,350 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Carmel have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Carmel has a higher median income of $132,859 compared to $100,913 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carmel at 49.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 5%, compared to 4% in Carmel.
- The unemployment rate in Carmel is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Carmel vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carmel | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 11 |
| White | 77 | 69 |
| Asian | 11 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carmel vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Carmel.
- Carmel has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Carmel at 11% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Carmel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 5% in Carmel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carmel and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carmel | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 9.0% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 27.0% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carmel vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 12.2% in Carmel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carmel at 21.8% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 12.1% compared to 9.0% in Carmel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carmel at 16.7% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 30.2% compared to 27.0% in Carmel.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Carmel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carmel | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (323) | 0.3% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (4,920) | 8.2% (3,052) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (2,394) | 3.7% (1,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 48.5% (49,477) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carmel vs Woodstock
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Carmel and Woodstock at 0.3%.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.2% compared to 4.8% in Carmel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 3.7%, compared to 2.3% in Carmel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carmel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 48.5% compared to 32.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.