Demographics details for Carmel, IN vs Woods hole, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carmel, IN vs Woods hole, MA.
| Data | Carmel | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,964 | 992 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 65.8 years |
| Median Income | $132,859 | $72,031 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Carmel vs Woods hole
- In Carmel, the population is higher at 101,964, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
- The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 40.6 years in Carmel.
- Carmel has a higher median income of $132,859 compared to $72,031 in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carmel at 49.0% compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
- The poverty level is higher in Woods hole at 5%, compared to 4% in Carmel.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Carmel and Woods hole at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Carmel vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carmel | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 77 | 96 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carmel vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carmel at 3% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 77% in Carmel.
- The Asian population is larger in Carmel at 11% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carmel at 4% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carmel at 5% compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carmel and Woods hole at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carmel | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 9.0% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 27.0% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carmel vs Woods hole
- In Woods hole, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.2% in Carmel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carmel at 21.8% compared to 21.5% in Woods hole.
- Woods hole has a higher smoking rate at 9.5% compared to 9.0% in Carmel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Carmel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carmel at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woods hole at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Carmel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carmel | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (323) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (4,920) | 7.4% (73) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (2,394) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 48.5% (49,477) | 67.2% (667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carmel vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of residents in Carmel have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Woods hole, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.4% compared to 4.8% in Carmel.
- More residents in Carmel have less than a high school education at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 48.5% in Carmel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.