Demographics details for Carmel, IN vs State line, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carmel, IN vs State line, MS.

Data Carmel State line
Population 101,964 458
Median Age 40.6 years 34.0 years
Median Income $132,859 $38,529
Married Families 49.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 4% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.5

Population Comparison: Carmel vs State line

  • In Carmel, the population is higher at 101,964, compared to 458 in State line.
  • Residents in Carmel have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 34.0 years in State line.
  • Carmel has a higher median income of $132,859 compared to $38,529 in State line.
  • In State line, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 49.0% in Carmel.
  • The poverty level is higher in State line at 18%, compared to 4% in Carmel.
  • State line has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Carmel.

Demographics

Demographics Carmel vs State line provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carmel State line
Black 3 97
White 77 3
Asian 11 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carmel vs State line

  • In State line, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 97% compared to 3% in Carmel.
  • Carmel has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 3% in State line.
  • The Asian population is larger in Carmel at 11% compared to 0% in State line.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Carmel at 4% compared to 0% in State line.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Carmel at 5% compared to 0% in State line.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carmel and State line at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carmel State line
Mental Health Not Good 12.2% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 6.9% 12.4%
Depression 21.8% 20.9%
Smoking 9.0% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 13.5%
Obesity 27.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 32.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carmel vs State line

  • In State line, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 12.2% in Carmel.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carmel at 21.8% compared to 20.9% in State line.
  • State line has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Carmel.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Carmel at 16.7% compared to 13.5% in State line.
  • State line has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 27.0% in Carmel.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in State line at 32.0% compared to 6.0% in Carmel.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carmel State line
No Schooling 0.3% (323) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 4.8% (4,920) 55.9% (256)
Less than High School 2.3% (2,394) 28.8% (132)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 48.5% (49,477) 4.1% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Carmel vs State line

  • A higher percentage of residents in Carmel have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in State line.
  • In State line, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 55.9% compared to 4.8% in Carmel.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in State line at 28.8%, compared to 2.3% in Carmel.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carmel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 48.5% compared to 4.1% in State line.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.