Demographics details for Carlisle, IN vs Washington, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carlisle, IN vs Washington, MO.
| Data | Carlisle | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 618 | 15,075 |
| Median Age | 52.6 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,250 | $75,127 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Carlisle vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 15,075, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- Residents in Carlisle have a higher median age of 52.6 years compared to 40.9 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $75,127, compared to $49,250 in Carlisle.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 36.0% in Carlisle.
- Carlisle has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate in Carlisle is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Carlisle vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carlisle | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 93 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carlisle vs Washington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carlisle at 2% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Carlisle has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 91% in Washington.
- Both Carlisle and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 7%, compared to 5% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carlisle and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carlisle | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carlisle vs Washington
- More residents in Carlisle report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.8% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carlisle at 27.0% compared to 24.6% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carlisle at 24.1% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 19.8% compared to 16.7% in Carlisle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carlisle at 37.0% compared to 36.6% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Carlisle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carlisle | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 0.3% (41) |
| High School Diploma | 28.8% (178) | 15.0% (2,260) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (24) | 8.7% (1,311) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (37) | 18.8% (2,838) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carlisle vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Carlisle have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carlisle hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 15.0% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 8.7%, compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.