Demographics details for Carlisle, IN vs Sylvania, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carlisle, IN vs Sylvania, GA.
| Data | Carlisle | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 618 | 2,602 |
| Median Age | 52.6 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $49,250 | $36,682 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Carlisle vs Sylvania
- The population in Sylvania is higher at 2,602, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- Residents in Carlisle have a higher median age of 52.6 years compared to 43.7 years in Sylvania.
- Carlisle has a higher median income of $49,250 compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carlisle at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- The poverty level is higher in Sylvania at 18%, compared to 9% in Carlisle.
- Sylvania has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Carlisle.
Demographics
Demographics Carlisle vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carlisle | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 57 |
| White | 93 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carlisle vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 2% in Carlisle.
- Carlisle has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
- Both Carlisle and Sylvania have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sylvania has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carlisle at 5% compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carlisle and Sylvania at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carlisle | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carlisle vs Sylvania
- More residents in Carlisle report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.9% in Sylvania.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carlisle at 27.0% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carlisle at 24.1% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carlisle at 16.7% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 37.0% in Carlisle.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sylvania at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Carlisle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carlisle | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 0.3% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 28.8% (178) | 27.1% (704) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (24) | 18.6% (485) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (37) | 10.4% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carlisle vs Sylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Carlisle have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carlisle hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 27.1% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sylvania at 18.6%, compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- In Sylvania, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.