Demographics details for Carlisle, IN vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carlisle, IN vs Central point, OR.
Data | Carlisle | Central point |
---|---|---|
Population | 618 | 19,222 |
Median Age | 52.6 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $49,250 | $79,731 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Carlisle vs Central point
- The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- Residents in Carlisle have a higher median age of 52.6 years compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $49,250 in Carlisle.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Carlisle.
- The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 9% in Carlisle.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Carlisle.
Demographics
Demographics Carlisle vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carlisle | Central point |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 93 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carlisle vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carlisle at 2% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Carlisle has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 76% in Central point.
- In Central point, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Carlisle.
- Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 5% in Carlisle.
- In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carlisle.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carlisle | Central point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 12.0% |
Depression | 27.0% | 29.4% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 37.0% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carlisle vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.1% in Carlisle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 27.0% in Carlisle.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carlisle at 24.1% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carlisle at 16.7% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carlisle at 37.0% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carlisle at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carlisle | Central point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 1.7% (319) |
High School Diploma | 28.8% (178) | 16.1% (3,095) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (24) | 13.2% (2,530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (37) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carlisle vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carlisle hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.