Demographics details for Carlin, NV vs Markleeville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carlin, NV vs Markleeville, CA.
Data | Carlin | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,950 | 163 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 64.6 years |
Median Income | $68,207 | $93,333 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 63.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Carlin vs Markleeville
- In Carlin, the population is higher at 1,950, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 36.3 years in Carlin.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $68,207 in Carlin.
- In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 52.0% in Carlin.
- The poverty level is identical in both Carlin and Markleeville at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Carlin is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Markleeville.
Demographics
Demographics Carlin vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carlin | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 23 | 77 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 34 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 32 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carlin vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carlin at 1% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Markleeville at 77% compared to 23% in Carlin.
- The Asian population is larger in Carlin at 7% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carlin at 34% compared to 23% in Markleeville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carlin at 32% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Carlin at 3% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carlin | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Depression | 22.3% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 34.7% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carlin vs Markleeville
- More residents in Carlin report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Markleeville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Markleeville at 23.0% versus 22.3% in Carlin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carlin at 20.0% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carlin at 17.6% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carlin at 34.7% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Carlin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carlin | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.7% (462) | 19.6% (32) |
Less than High School | 11.2% (219) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (210) | 35.6% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carlin vs Markleeville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Carlin and Markleeville at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carlin hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
- More residents in Carlin have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 10.8% in Carlin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.