Demographics details for Carleton, MI vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carleton, MI vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Carleton | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,350 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,028 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Carleton vs Ho ho kus
- The population in Ho ho kus is higher at 4,216, compared to 2,350 in Carleton.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Carleton.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $54,028 in Carleton.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 40.0% in Carleton.
- Carleton has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Carleton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Carleton vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carleton | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 84 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carleton vs Ho ho kus
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Carleton and Ho ho kus at 1%.
- Carleton has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Carleton.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Carleton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carleton at 10% compared to 8% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carleton and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carleton | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 5.8% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carleton vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Carleton report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carleton at 24.1% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carleton at 17.4% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carleton at 19.8% compared to 19.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carleton at 39.4% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carleton at 21.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carleton | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (15) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (713) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 20.8% (488) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (160) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carleton vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in Carleton have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carleton hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in Carleton have less than a high school education at 20.8% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 6.8% in Carleton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.