Demographics details for Canton, PA vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, PA vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Canton | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,719 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 34.2 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $41,000 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 1,719 in Canton.
- Residents in Canton have a higher median age of 34.2 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $41,000 in Canton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Canton at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Canton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canton | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 22 |
| White | 100 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Canton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Canton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 0% in Canton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canton and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canton | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Clayton
- More residents in Canton report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Canton at 25.9% compared to 23.1% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 23.5% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 42.4% compared to 39.9% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Canton at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canton | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (8) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (479) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (243) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (231) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Canton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 13.4% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.