Demographics details for Canton, MS vs Markleeville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, MS vs Markleeville, CA.
Data | Canton | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,744 | 163 |
Median Age | 35.6 years | 64.6 years |
Median Income | $33,411 | $93,333 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 63.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Markleeville
- In Canton, the population is higher at 10,744, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 35.6 years in Canton.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $33,411 in Canton.
- In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 20.0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The unemployment rate in Canton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Markleeville.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Canton | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 76 | Data is updating |
White | 16 | 77 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 76% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Markleeville at 77% compared to 16% in Canton.
- Both Canton and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 7% in Canton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Canton at 1% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canton and Markleeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Canton | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 18.8% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 45.8% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Markleeville
- In Markleeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Canton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Markleeville at 23.0% versus 18.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 21.7% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 45.8% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Canton | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (103) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (1,891) | 19.6% (32) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (1,853) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,587) | 35.6% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- In Markleeville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 17.6% in Canton.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 14.8% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.