Demographics details for Canton, MS vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, MS vs Flomaton, AL.
Data | Canton | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,744 | 1,458 |
Median Age | 35.6 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $33,411 | $37,500 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Flomaton
- In Canton, the population is higher at 10,744, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Canton have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher median income of $37,500, compared to $33,411 in Canton.
- In Flomaton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 20.0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Flomaton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Canton and Flomaton at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Canton | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Black | 76 | 38 |
White | 16 | 58 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 76% compared to 38% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flomaton at 58% compared to 16% in Canton.
- Both Canton and Flomaton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Canton at 7% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flomaton at 4%, compared to 1% in Canton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canton and Flomaton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Canton | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.3% |
Depression | 18.8% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 45.8% | 45.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.6% in Canton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 18.8% in Canton.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 21.7% in Canton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Flomaton at 13.7% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 45.8% compared to 45.3% in Flomaton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Canton | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (103) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (1,891) | 25.0% (364) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (1,853) | 19.1% (278) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,587) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 17.6% in Canton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 17.2% in Canton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.