Demographics details for Canton, MS vs Darwin, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, MS vs Darwin, MN.
| Data | Canton | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,744 | 344 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $33,411 | $62,083 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Darwin
- In Canton, the population is higher at 10,744, compared to 344 in Darwin.
- Residents in Canton have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 34.8 years in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher median income of $62,083, compared to $33,411 in Canton.
- In Darwin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 20.0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Darwin.
- The unemployment rate in Canton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Darwin.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Darwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canton | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Darwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 76% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Darwin at 90% compared to 16% in Canton.
- Both Canton and Darwin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Darwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Canton.
- Both Canton and Darwin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canton and Darwin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canton | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 22.3% |
| Obesity | 45.8% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Darwin
- More residents in Canton report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Darwin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Darwin at 23.2% versus 18.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 21.7% compared to 17.5% in Darwin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Darwin at 22.3% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 45.8% compared to 32.7% in Darwin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Darwin at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canton | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (103) | 1.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (1,891) | 20.9% (72) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,853) | 9.3% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,587) | 11.9% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Darwin
- In Darwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.0% in Canton.
- In Darwin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 17.6% in Canton.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 9.3% in Darwin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 11.9% in Darwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.